Blog

Chagos Islands deal: Mauritius hints talks stuck over money

The proposed deal has also attracted criticism in the UK, with the opposition Conservative party calling it a “monumental failure of statecraft”.

When the agreement was first made public after years of talks, UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and the then Mauritian Prime Minister Pravind Jugnauth called it a “seminal moment in our relationship and a demonstration of our enduring commitment to the peaceful resolution of disputes and the rule of law”.

It sought to end decades of uncertainty and dispute over the status of the islands.

In a joint statement issued on Friday, the UK and Mauritius said they were committed “to finalising a treaty as quickly as possible” that included both the “secure and effective operation of the existing base on Diego Garcia and that Mauritius is sovereign over the archipelago”.

They added that “ongoing conversations” were productive.

The new Mauritian government, elected in a landslide last month, has not been explicit in public about what exactly its problems with the deal were.

But talking to his constituents on Sunday, Deputy Prime Minister Paul Bérenger spoke about the money involved.

“This base existed on our land, on our territory… but not only it is [about] our sovereignty. There are some things you can’t accept if you’re a true patriot. They are trying to make us sign and they are quibbling on a small amount,” he said.

Speaking in parliament last week about the negotiations Bérenger admitted that Mauritius needs “money to get out of the economic mess the previous government got us into, but not at any price, not under any conditions”.

Addressing MPs on Friday, Prime Minister Navin Ramgoolam said that the UK was keen to complete the deal “before [Donald] Trump swears in as president on 20 January”.

Marco Rubio, Trump’s pick for secretary of state, has described the deal as a threat to US security.

Last week in the UK’s House of Commons, Shadow Foreign Secretary Dame Priti Patel accused the Labour government of putting the UK’s national security at risk, ignoring the interests of Chagossians, and “letting our standing go into freefall” in an increasingly dangerous world.

“How much is the British taxpayer going to be liable for each year, and in total, over 99 years?” she asked.

Foreign Office Minister Stephen Doughty insisted the deal would enhance, not damage UK security, saying it would protect the military base’s operation and ensure it was “on a safe footing well into the next century”.

In recent years, the UK has faced rising diplomatic isolation over its claim to what it refers to as the British Indian Ocean Territory, with various United Nations bodies – including its top court and general assembly – overwhelmingly siding with Mauritius and demanding the UK surrender what some have called its “last colony in Africa”.

The government of Mauritius has long argued that it was illegally forced to give the Chagos Islands away in return for its own independence from the UK in 1968.

Until very recently, the UK insisted that Mauritius itself had no legitimate claim to the islands.


Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button